There is a fine line between freedom fighter and terrorist. If you were attacked or provoked, is your natural response of retaliation terrorism? A definition of terrorism is the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes. A definition of a freedom fighter is a fighter for freedom, esp. a person who battles against established forces of tyranny and dictatorship. By these definitions both freedom fighter’s, and terrorist’s are fighting the same entity. This entity is politically motivated and oppresses the freedom fighter or terrorist. Franklin D. Roosevelt once said “the only thing to fear is fear itself”. Today our mainstream media coupled with our political leaders often use threats of terror in speech’s and reports. The events that had taken place on September 11th 2001 have been used repeatedly to intimidate and instill fear. Sniper’s, anthrax, murderous rampage, Islamic extremists, Al qeida, Taliban, Hezbolah, Palestinian militants etc. Danger, Will Robinson danger! The department of homeland security has gone as far as to create the homeland security advisory system. -link- The United States is currently facing an issue of illegal immigration. The US borders have been considered porous and talks of amnesty for 12-20 million illegal immigrants has been put on the table. This simple fact contradicts all potential threat’s of terrorism. -link- How many of these illegal aliens are Islamic extremists? Would any of these people possibly conspire mass murder? On May 15th Presidential hopeful Dr. Ron Paul had questioned US foreign policy in the recent Presidential Republican debate. Rudy Gooliani immediately attacked Paul, and tried to demonize the mere notion of flaws within US foreign policy. Gooliani went as far as requesting an apology from Paul, and asking for the Congressman to repeal his statements. He was then attacked again by Fox News correspondent Shawn Insanity. Also attempting to askew, or spin Ron Paul’s statements. Shawn Insanity had tried to excuse the flaws in US foreign policy on the basis of morality. Claiming it is immoral to sit idly by and let other nations fight their own wars or disputes. Paul had slammed back with the power of knowledge! Implying Shawn Insanity, and Rudolph Gooliani are ignorant of the CIA’s own studies mentioned in the 911 commission report. Which states US actions over sea’s adversely effect in threats and hostile actions against American’s. -link- The verbal attacks of Dr. Ron Paul are obviously due to his popularity among the American people. We the people are speaking out and showing our support. He is winning in all the polls, and poses a major threat to the military industrial complex. Big business will do whatever they can to stifle Paul. Demonize all you want, it is only fueling the fire! -link-
Submitted by branewashed

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America was launched in March of 2005. It is said to be a trilateral effort to increase security and enhance prosperity among the US, Canada and Mexico. This effort to increase so called “security” has been implemented in secrecy. My question is, if this is an attempt to enhance security then why is it so secret? Wouldn’t the Council on Foreign Relations want to relish in their great achievements in enhancing this so called security? The SPP has been denied to even exist and anyone who even mentioned the act was considered “a conspiracy nut”. It has been discussed briefly in the mainstream media on CNN’s Lou Dobbs Tonight - -link- Lou Dobbs has been attacked by illegal alien advocacy groups and asked CNN to fire him as MSNBC had done to Don Imus. To me this isn’t just an attack of Lou Dobbs, or Don Imus this is an attack on the freedom of speech. Which in turn is an attack of our freedom of information. Having this information be brought to the spotlight by people such as Lou Dobbs, this plot to merge the US. with Canada, and Mexico can no longer be denied. The limitation of your freedom of speech is socialistic, and what you would expect from tyrannical dictatorships. So why is this attack on freedom of speech happening here in the United States? Is history repeating itself? Is this American Union an attempt to globalize government? This can also be considered to be what George H.W. Bush had termed as a New World Order. - -link- Along with the Bush’s and others, US Attorney Gen. John Ashcroft had also repeated this plan of a New World Order. This plan for a New World Order is not new. It has actually been around for quite sometime, stemming back to Nazi Germany and Adolf Hitler. This New World Order goes hand in hand with global domination. Here is a cartoon from the 1940's - -link- “If your not with us then your with the terrorists” George W. Bush remarks. As well as condemning any person who would question what actually happened on September 11th 2001. -link- No longer do you have the right to question. If you question your government then maybe you are a terrorist? On Oct. 26th 2001 George Bush signed into law The USA Patriot act. This being done while Congress wasn’t even given the liberty to actually read the stipulations of this act. There were a few Congressman who had voted against this act, one namely presidential candidate Ron Paul, stating it as being “unconstitutional”. This act has been manipulated by the federal government and has been used against citizens of the United States. An archive of events that are examples of this manipulation can be found at - -link- This Patriot act is eerily parallel with what Adolf Hitler had initiated in Nazi Germany, the Enabling act. The similarities of what happened to the German’s and what is happening to Americans, seems to be a little more than coincidental.
Submitted by branewashed

Despite not given equal amount of time to speak at the recent democratic debate, Mike Gravel former Alaskan senator had turned a few heads. Mentioning “the military industrial complex not only control’s our government lock stock and barrel, but they control our culture”. After being questioned of his stance on funding the Iraq war Gravel stated this war was entered on a fraudulent basis. Gravel suggests a law be passed to make it a felony to stay in Iraq. Adding that if the law is struck down, it would in turn flush out those who are keeping the war going and who is not. Gravel had said it wouldn’t matter if he was president or not. After he was asked what he meant by this statement. He received a bolstering roar of laughter from the audience by saying at first he thought my god how did I get here, but six months later saying how the hell did these other candidates get here? Gravel expressed he is frightened by the top tier candidates. Due to these mainline candidates saying “there is nothing off the table with respect to Iran”. Saying this is code for using nuclear devices as a preempt for war. Gravel was very adamant of the non proliferation treaty expressing that the US is hypocritical by expecting regulations on other nations while the US continues to expand it’s nuclear programs. Mike Gravel had made some very bold statements that may not get him more exposure. He will obviously be shunned by mainstream media. Although we have the internet and the bold will be heard there. I wouldn’t doubt it if Bill O’liely calls for him to be thrown in prison, or to be labeled as “un-American”. Rupert Murdoch owner of the Fox corporation is known to have meetings with Hitlery or I mean Shillery Clinton on numerous occasions. Obviously there is going to be a push in that direction on all Fox news casts. It’s up to all of us to spread information, and put a stop to the attack on the freedom of speech. We are in an information war The Russian motto in WWII was not one step back. Meaning not to be scared, and not to compromise. If you give an inch a mile will be taken. It is up to us all to fight for freedom, to fight for our rights. Defend our freedom Attack, attack, and when in doubt attack again. Watch Mike Gravel - -link-
Submitted by branewashed

After the republican debate last Thursday May 3rd the public was given a chance to speak out. Msnbc posted polls in which gave we the people a chance to voice our opinion’s as to whom won the debate. Congressman Ron Paul shown phenomenal support in all area’s of these polls, while Gooliani shown to be the opposite. Meanwhile so called “mainstream” media claims Gooliani was at the head of the pack. Personally I found it odd that shortly after the debate commentators announced “let’s go to the spin room”, the spin room indeed This propaganda is so blatant you have to be living in a dream world not to see it Wake UP! These media tycoon’s have stolen your voice Skeptical? Well here are a couple of links you can goto and see first hand for yourself. Do your part in saving the US, and support Ron Paul. -link- -link- Watch what Ron Paul said here: -link-
Submitted by branewashed

Your spin of the recent Republican debate is absolutely horrid. You all at msnbc should be ashamed of yourselves for contributing to such garbage. You say Mit Romney won the debate? Ha! The interactive polls display the contrary. Congressman Ron Paul is shown to have the majority of support from we the people. Those of you who are controlled by the neo-con agenda are contributing to the destruction of our once great country. For those of you who think you will be safe from devastating outcome of your mind controlling news spins, you are living a lie. You too, will be under the same jackboot as the rest of us. This is remnant of Nazi Germany and the misinformation Hitler spewed to the German citizens of our not so recent past. Wake up! Support Ron Paul!
Submitted by branewashed